LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract
This dissertation aims to answer the question: Why did developed countries tend to vote against some human rights resolutions at the Third Committee of the United Nations (UN) General Assembly, while developing countries tended to support some human rights resolutions more often than developed ones? A proposed qualitative study, designed to tackle new patterns that systematically influence the voting position of developed countries and built on scholars’ arguments and findings, is the main stream of my dissertation.
The methodology differs from using data collection of some human rights resolutions, categorized under specific issues and agenda items and recorded since just after the Cold War until the 74th Session of 2019 at the UN. In addition, an intensive self-observation of informal negotiation sessions (2014-2018) to draft resolutions was held at the UN before voting took place; self-observations of official voting sessions (2014-2018); interviews with experts and specialists at UN agencies and states missions; interviews of outsider professionals from policy-oriented research centers affiliated with and specializing in UN studies, and academics. These observations were made in tandem with theoretical frameworks based on hypotheses and postulates that were developed in other disciplinary settings.
Numerous UN bodies are tackling human rights matters from different angles. This dissertation focuses mainly on the Third Committee: Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural, at the General Assembly of the United Nations, the committee directly related to human rights resolutions in New York and on some Human Rights Council-related reports in Geneva. My selection of the Third Committee’s resolutions is categorized and grouped as the following: human rights selective resolutions, freedom of religion, children’s rights and women’s advancement, and electoral self-determination.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Developed countries
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Global Affairs
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Identifier
ETD_11236
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-82dw-9j14
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (vi, 210 pages)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.