Home
Resource
Authentic vs. synthetic: a comparison of different methods for studying task-based information seeking
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(1.58 MB)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Wang, Yiwei. Authentic vs. synthetic: a comparison of different methods for studying task-based information seeking. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-cp9w-jq38

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleAuthentic vs. synthetic: a comparison of different methods for studying task-based information seeking
NameWang, Yiwei (author); Shah, Chirag (chair); Belkin, Nicholas J. (internal member); Costello, Kaitlin Light (internal member); Kelly, Diane (outside member); Rutgers University; School of Graduate Studies
Date Created2020
Other Date2020-10 (degree)
SubjectTask-based information seeking, Communication, Information and Library Studies
Extent1 online resource (xi, 140 pages) : illustrations
DescriptionIn task-based information seeking research, researchers often collect data about users’ online behaviors to predict task characteristics and personalize information for users. User behavior may be directly influenced by the environment in which a study is conducted, and the tasks used. This dissertation investigates the impact of study setting and task authenticity on users’ searching behaviors, perceived task characteristics, and search experiences. Thirty-six undergraduate participants finished one lab session and one remote session in which they completed one authentic and one simulated task. The findings demonstrate that the synthetic lab setting and simulated tasks had significant influences mostly on behaviors related to content pages, such as page dwell time and the number of pages visited per task. Meanwhile, first-query behaviors were less affected than whole-session behaviors, indicating the reliability of using first-query behaviors in task prediction. Subjective task characteristics—such as task motivation and importance—also varied in different settings and tasks. Interview data reveal why users were influenced. This dissertation addresses methodological limitations in existing research and provides new insights and implications for researchers who collect online user search behavioral data.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-cp9w-jq38
LanguageEnglish
CollectionSchool of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024