Staff View
One size does not fit all: gender, audience, and problematizing the notion of 'candidate self-presentation' online

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
One size does not fit all: gender, audience, and problematizing the notion of 'candidate self-presentation' online
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Nevin
NamePart (type = given)
Jessica Venita
NamePart (type = date)
1983-
DisplayForm
Jessica Venita Nevin
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Carroll
NamePart (type = given)
Susan J
DisplayForm
Susan J Carroll
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact); (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes)
2020
DateOther (type = degree); (qualifier = exact); (encoding = w3cdtf)
2020-10
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
Gender structures multiple aspects of how candidates present themselves to the public, and it is reinforced particularly by the media. However, I argue that it does not affect all aspects of self-presentation equally; that is, it may be easier for women to contest gender norms on some aspects than on others. I theorize that this is due to the public-private divide, which not only shapes expectations for how men and women candidates will present themselves on various aspects, but also the degree to which women will receive “backlash” for contesting those expectations. The closer to women’s essential private, domestic role an aspect of campaigns is, the more backlash they may receive, and the more complicated it may be for them to try to contest those norms. On the other hand, when aspects are more removed from their private role may allow for greater flexibility to contest norms. I investigate how gender structures three aspects of self-presentation – family roles, personality traits and issue competencies – to assess how men and women currently navigate self-presentation. I measure this by the degree to which women either contest gendered expectations by presenting themselves in gender-incongruent ways, or embody such expectations by pursuing a gender-congruent strategy. I understand candidates as reelection-seeking and backlash-avoidant. I rely on tweets, coded for mentions of family roles, traits and issues, from all major-party candidates for U.S. House in 2016 to address these questions. My findings are complex and nuanced. Overall, they demonstrate that women are especially less likely to mention their marital role than men are, but candidates of both genders mostly minimize mentions of family, suggesting that, with respect to family roles, the balance of gender power is relatively even on Twitter. Gender may be less salient there. However, the aspects of self-presentation that I examine have been shown to carry gendered connotations, and candidates’ minimizing them may be, in part, a reaction to those connotations. The aspects may receive less activity because campaigns perceive that they carry less salience when the balance of gender power is even. Thus, they are still strategizing around, performing, gender. In addition, women candidates tend to pursue gender-incongruent behavior in the personality traits they claim, avoiding even potentially positive feminine traits like “compassion.” Finally, policy issues are the only aspect on which women can embrace gender-congruent behavior, which they do by emphasizing feminine issues. I also explore how party may influence strategy when navigating gendered norms. These findings suggest that norms that are more closely tied to women’s private role are indeed more complicated to navigate.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Women in politics
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Gender politics
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Social media in politics
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Political Science
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_11286
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (ix, 247 pages)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-v0gv-e353
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Nevin
GivenName
Jessica
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2020-10-04 21:46:28
AssociatedEntity
Name
Jessica Nevin
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.6
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-10-12T21:35:42
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-10-12T21:35:42
ApplicationName
Acrobat Pro DC 20.12.20048
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024