Staff View
Exploring infant's response to sensory qualities of complementary foods to increase vegetable consumption

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Exploring infant's response to sensory qualities of complementary foods to increase vegetable consumption
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Attardo
NamePart (type = given)
Maria
DisplayForm
Maria Attardo
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = text)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Byrd-Bredbenner
NamePart (type = given)
Carol
DisplayForm
Carol Byrd-Bredbenner
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD graduate
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact); (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes)
2020
DateOther (type = degree); (qualifier = exact); (encoding = w3cdtf)
2020-10
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract
Statement of Problem: Infant complementary feedings lay the foundation for lifelong habits and food preferences that promote wellness and prevent chronic disease. Yet few studies exist examining infant food preferences and acceptance. There are no dietary recommendations for infants, as most studies have focused on children over age 4. More studies are necessary to explore infant food acceptance to guide future recommendations to increase fruit and vegetable intake during the introductory period.

Objective: The objective was to examine the association between the sensory qualities of food and infant food acceptance or rejection during the food introductory period.

Methods: A pilot study using a survey questionnaire was designed to assess infant taste reactions to variables of color, smell, taste, temperature, and texture. The study included18 mother-infant dyads. Infants ranged from 6 to 12 months of age and mothers ranged from 17 to 36 years old. All mothers participated in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Mothers indicated whether their infant was breast or formula-fed. Outcome measures used included mothers maintaining a neutral expression, infant facial expressions and number of spoonfuls eaten as indicators for infants’ response to novel food, as well as mothers’ and investigators’ rating of infant overall reaction to the food. Mothers also rated their infant’s preference due to food sensory variables. Any comments or reactions made by mothers which were associated with the feeding were recorded by the lead investigator and one of two research assistants. Descriptive statistics using means, standard deviations, and percentage were used to report infant anthropometric, demographic, and outcome measures. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was also performed to determine inter rater agreement between mother and researchers’ ratings of the infant trial baby food.

Results: Mothers reported their babies had little preference for the color of food including green colored foods. Foods that smelled good were preferred by their babies and sometimes, but rarely, smells of food were disliked. Additionally, sweet tastes were preferred by infants over bitter tastes, with the majority rarely disliking bitter tastes. Infants preferred their food to be sometimes at room temperature or warm. Infants also favored smooth textures and disliked chunky textures. Most infants were rated by mothers and investigators as accepting and liking the novel food offered during data collection. Both mothers’ ratings of infant food acceptance and investigators’ ratings were similar. Method of infant feeding had no bearing on the outcome. Many mothers were surprised their infants ate the food and one mother’s personal food bias prematurely stopped the feeding session. Kendall’s W findings indicated that all three raters had near perfect agreement.

Conclusions: Formula-fed infants were as accepting as breastfed infants to a novel food. Most infants whose mothers maintained a neutral face accepted a novel green vegetable. Although the study did not test the idea that a mother can limit her infant’s exposure to vegetables due to her own food bias, it appears to support this view. Furthermore, this study supports prior work indicating that infant willingness to eat, and not infant facial expressions, should guide feedings because it may take several repeated offerings at meals for the infant’s facial expression to change.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Nutritional Sciences
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_11244
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (ix, 43 pages)
Note (type = degree)
M.S.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-5mec-yx75
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Attardo
GivenName
Maria
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2020-09-29 17:53:14
AssociatedEntity
Name
Maria Attardo
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent
Type
Embargo
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2020-10-31
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = end)
2021-05-02
Detail
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after May 2nd, 2021.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.6
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-09-29T11:06:34
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-09-29T11:06:50
ApplicationName
Adobe PDF Library 20.12.80
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024