Home
Resource
Program evaluation of sepsis bundle and development of modified program
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(10.06 MB)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Oruebor, Rosemary E.. Program evaluation of sepsis bundle and development of modified program. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-49qf-a237

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleProgram evaluation of sepsis bundle and development of modified program
NameOruebor, Rosemary E. (author); Avadhani, Amita (chair); Cardinale, Maria (co-chair); Rana, Haris (co-chair); Rutgers University; School of Nursing - RBHS
Date Created2021
Other Date2021-01 (degree)
SubjectSepsis, Septic shock, Sepsis bundle compliance, Sepsis program evaluation, Sepsis benchmark, Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, CMS sepsis reimbursement, Critical care, Post-Master's DNP Practice
Extent1 online resource (116 pages) : illustrations
DescriptionPurpose of Project: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to perform a program evaluation of a community teaching hospital (CTH) sepsis bundle and utilize the data gathered from the program evaluation for the development of a modified program.

Methodology: Stufflebeam’s CIPP (context, input, process, product) evaluation model was the theoretical framework that guided the study. Under the CIPP components, the study design utilized existing hospital sepsis data reports, registered nurses survey (n = 50) using a five-point Likert-type scale questionnaire, a secondary analysis of chart review data, and a gap analysis.

Results: Results indicated that CTH sepsis bundle compliance was below its 2019 benchmark goals and insufficient knowledge among some nurses on CTH sepsis bundle protocol. Also, the result showed that lactic acid (16.5%) was the highest category responsible for sepsis bundle failure in 2019, followed by antibiotics (9.4%), intravenous fluids (5.9%), blood cultures (3.5%), and repeat volume and tissue perfusion (2.4%). The gap analysis result showed that the CTH sepsis bundle was 100% compliant with CMS SEP-1 core measure guidelines.

Implications for Practice: This program evaluation resulted in a compilation of recommendations for program modifications that can improve sepsis bundle compliance, benchmark scores, and hospital finance. The recommendations can also help CTH attain its yearly bundle compliance goals.
NoteDNP
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-49qf-a237
LanguageEnglish
CollectionSchool of Nursing (RBHS) DNP Projects
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024