LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
The COVID-19 pandemic in the United States brought to the forefront a new iteration of barriers to abortion access that continue a long history of regulations and restrictions on abortion procedures despite its constitutional protections. During the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, individual states following federal recommendations halted healthcare procedures deemed elective/non-essential in an effort to preserve supplies, staff, and space for essential services in an attempt to handle the increasing burden on the healthcare system. In some states, the designation of elective included abortion procedures which quickly brought about several lawsuits from the ACLU and abortion providers. This paper employs a reproductive justice framework to consider the impact of such policies including rhetorical ramifications of designating abortion procedures as elective healthcare and the risk and impact of suspending procedures on marginalized communities through the case study of Texas and Planned Parenthood v. Abbott. Also considered are the differential impacts along racial and class lines via barriers the FDA placed by the reinstatement of in-person dispensing requirements for mifepristone - the primary drug for medication abortion procedures - through the Supreme Court decision in the case of ACOG v. FDA. This paper argues for the rhetorical integration of abortion procedures into essential healthcare to minimize the impact of state restrictions on marginalized communities and suggests that an attention to administrative policies and the violence they enact may provide an avenue for tangible action in expanding access to abortion care via utilization of telemedicine technologies.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Women's and Gender Studies
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Abortion politics
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Abortion
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Identifier
ETD_11594
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-fbjv-3b50
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (v, 111 pages)
Note (type = degree)
M.A.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.