Home
Resource
A dual information single process model of recognition
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(3.46 MB)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Kang, Mengxue. A dual information single process model of recognition. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-625m-pd21

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleA dual information single process model of recognition
NameKang, Mengxue (author); Glass, Arnold (chair); Michel, Melchi (member); Hemmer, Pernille (member); McLaughlin, Brian (member); Rutgers University; School of Graduate Studies
Date Created2021
Other Date2021-10 (degree)
SubjectPsychology, Recognition (Psychology), Recollection (Psychology), Confidence rating, Dual process, Familiarity
Extent1 online resource (x, 116 pages) : illustrations
DescriptionIn recognition, remember responses are understood to be based on recollection and know responses are understood to be based on familiarity. Two kinds of models have been proposed for the process by which recognition decisions are made. In single process models, familiarity and recollection are integrated and there is a single criterion for recognition. In dual process models, familiarity and recollection are segregated and there are separate criteria for remember and know judgments. Recent process models can account for the distribution of remember and know responses (under a range of different assumptions), but do not address the time course of the recognition process. Paradoxical findings, indicating that familiarity is available faster than recollection but remember responses are on average faster than know responses, cannot be convincingly explained by any existing dual process model. We propose a new model that resolves this paradox by analyzing in detail the time course of recollection and familiarity. Know responses based on the high familiarity of the test item are faster than remember responses based on recollection. However, low familiarity, low recollection responses are slow and are also categorized by participants as know responses. Hence, the average know response time is slower than average remember response time because know responses include both fast, high familiarity responses and slow, low familiarity, low recollection responses. A 12-parameter quantitative model describes the relationship among the effects of confidence, accuracy, and remember and know categorization on accuracy and reaction time (RT). The r2 = .92 for the fit between expected RT and observed RT for targets and lures.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Genretheses
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-625m-pd21
LanguageEnglish
CollectionSchool of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024