Home
Resource
Chronopolitanism: political inclusion and the distant future
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after March 24, 2025.
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

John, Tyler M.. Chronopolitanism: political inclusion and the distant future. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-zngb-3j04

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleChronopolitanism: political inclusion and the distant future
NameJohn, Tyler M. (author); Guerrero, Alexander (chair); Temkin, Larry S (member); Budolfson, Mark B (member); MacAskill, William (member); Rutgers University; School of Graduate Studies
Date Created2022
Other Date2022-01 (degree)
SubjectPhilosophy, Political science, Animal rights, Future generations, Legitimacy, Longtermism, Representation, Utilitarianism
Extent169 pages
DescriptionAn area of recent philosophical interest concerns longtermism. Longtermism is the view that we should be particularly concerned with (even distant) future generations. It is sometimes strengthened in the form of strong longtermism, the view that the primary determinant of the moral value of our actions today is their effect on the long-term future. The long-term future, here, refers to a period of time surprisingly far into the future, such as 1,000 years from now. Progenitors of longtermism have characteristically been most concerned, morally, with the aggregate welfare of the long-term future, and practically, with work to reduce the risk of human extinction. I aim to broaden the scope of longtermist reflection, morally, by providing an analysis of a set of non-welfarist and non-consequentialist intergenerational ideals, and practically, by providing an analysis of a set of interventions which may rival extinction risk reduction in the value of their long-term effects.

In Chapter 1, I consider the prospects for extending the non-welfarist and (predominantly) nonconsequentialist ideals of political legitimacy to future generations, contrary to the tacit assumptions of political philosophers. I show that, among extant accounts of political legitimacy, the most promising accounts of the grounds of political legitimacy imply that States have duties of legitimacy to future generations as well as to present citizens. In Chapter 2, I analyse a set of interventions for improving the value of the far future through the amelioration of political short-termism, the excessive priority that political systems give to present net benefits at the cost of future ones. I show that one popular set of proposed interventions centred on youth empowerment is unlikely to significantly increase the time horizons of political systems, and propose a novel set of political institutions employing a novel system of retrospective accountability which shows much greater promise. In Chapter 3, I analyse a set of interventions for improving the value of the far future through a form of moral values change, specifically interventions which seek to improve the far future by shaping humanity’s moral attitudes towards nonhuman animals today. This set of interventions is initially promising, but its case hinges on highly controversial theory about consciousness, the persistence of changes to human values, and about the psychological relationship between our various moral attitudes.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Genretheses
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-zngb-3j04
LanguageEnglish
CollectionSchool of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024