LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
Enrolling in a doctoral program is a difficult decision to make. The deliberation and application process becomes even more complicated when a discipline offers two doctoral degrees with no apparent distinction. Whereas scholars have argued the differences between the EdD and the PhD in education for almost a century (Freeman, 1931; Leist & Scott, 2011), few studies have explored how students differentiate between the two degrees to enroll in one over the other. This heuristic research study describes the essence of 20 Blackwomens' doctoral program choice experience. Essential to note is that Moustakas (1990) designed a heuristic research methodology to include the principal collaborator's occurrences and relationship to the phenomena to co-define the experience alongside the collaborators. This research also brings forward a culturally relevant qualitative data collection method highlighting Blackwomen’s unique communication patterns, Sistachat. Designed to bring Blackwomen's voices from the void (Morrison, 2007) Sistachat supports naming their knowledge on a nearly 100-year-old scholarly debate about the differences between the EdD and PhD. Data from this study revealed that: 1) gendered racism and gendered racialized socialization influence Blackwomen to pursue doctoral study in education, 2) Blackwomen have differential access during the information-gathering process, 3) perceived access to one program over another has implications on decision-making, and 4) Blackwomen employ identity alignment to select either the EdD or the PhD.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Higher education
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Black studies
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Women's studies
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Blackwomen doctoral students
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
College choice process
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Culturally relevant data collection methods
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Doctoral program choice
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
EdD and PhD
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Gendered racism
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
http://dissertations.umi.com/gsnb.rutgers:12256
PhysicalDescription
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
355 pages : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.