LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
Associative neuroplasticity permits the brain’s sensory systems to tune their sensitivity to ecologically critical stimuli and optimize discrimination between threat-predictive and neutral stimuli. However, dysfunctional plasticity leading to generalization of fear could underlie maladaptive fear learning such as in PTSD and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Mechanistic studies in animals have demonstrated a suggestive linkage between sensory discrimination and associative-learning related discrimination, where animals that tend to generalize their fear responses across sensory stimuli also exhibit generalized changes in the sensorineural processing of those stimuli. In Part I, this dissertation explores aversive learning-induced sensory processing changes in humans. We found that after odor-cued aversive conditioning participants exhibiting normal levels of trait anxiety developed a larger skin conductance response (SCR) to the shock-predictive odor and substantial improvement in their perceptual discrimination between the two odors. Repeated exposure to the odors without shock partially extinguished the SCRs evoked by the threat-predictive odor but the improved olfactory discrimination persisted. By contrast, participants with high levels of trait anxiety developed comparably sized SCRs to both odors and displayed no improvement in their perceptual discrimination between them. Learning-induced perceptual plasticity is thus a normal part of sensory function that can be impaired in people with high levels of trait anxiety. In Part II, this dissertation uses neurophysiological experiments in a mouse model to explore the neural mechanisms by which odor-cued aversive conditioning can induce plasticity in early olfactory processing in the nervous system. This includes three main questions: a) when a mouse undergoes behaviorally generalizing olfactory fear conditioning, does the olfactory input from the nose to brain show enhancements that parallel this generalization, b) when the odor no longer predicts a shock, does the learning-related neuroplasticity reverse, and c) whether exposure to novel stimuli can “refine” otherwise generalizing fear into discriminative fear. Using an odor-cued fear conditioning paradigm designed to induce behavioral generalization of fear, we found that odor-evoked synaptic output from olfactory nerve into the brain’s olfactory bulb was greatly increased not only for the actually threat-predictive odor but also for novel odors that evoked generalized fear, even under anesthesia. This increase was equivalent in olfactory sensory neuron populations that respond to the threat-predictive odor and in those that did not, ruling out a classic explanation of generalization through overlapping neural representations between the stimuli. Conventional extinction training in which the threat-predictive odor was presented repeatedly without shocks reversed both the behavioral fear and the increased olfactory nerve output evoked by all odors. An alternative extinction paradigm using a panel of odorants similarly reversed neurophysiological enhancements and extinguished behavioral fear. Taken together the increased olfactory signaling to fear-evoking odors and the reversal of this increase when the mouse is no longer afraid of an odor suggests that the olfactory nerve plasticity follows the mouse’s perception of threat, even for olfactory stimuli and neuronal populations that have never actually been paired with shock. It is surprising that such beliefs about odor-shock contingencies would manifest as early as the synaptic input from the nose to the brain. Taken together, Part I and Part II demonstrate the fundamental linkage between learning, sensory processing, and perceptual plasticity and suggest that disruption of neurosensory plasticity may be part of the etiology or maintenance of anxiety.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Neurosciences
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Behavioral psychology
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Systems science
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Anxiety
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Fear
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Olfaction
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Optical imaging
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Psychophysics
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Sensory neuroplasticity
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Identifier
http://dissertations.umi.com/gsnb.rutgers:12352
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-8dt4-x891
PhysicalDescription
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
95 pages : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
RelatedItem (type = other version)
TitleInfo
Title
High trait anxiety blocks olfactory plasticity induced by aversive learning
Identifier (type = doi)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108324
Note (type = general note)
Part I. Is a manuscript published in 2022 by Elsevier, in Biological Psychology: High trait anxiety blocks olfactory plasticity induced by aversive learning by Michelle C. Rosenthal, Michael A. Bacallao, Adam T. Garcia and John P. McGann. Citation below.
Rosenthal MC, Bacallao MA, Garcia AT, McGann JP. High trait anxiety blocks olfactory plasticity induced by aversive learning. Biol Psychol. 2022 Apr;170:108324. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108324. Epub 2022 Mar 25. PMID: 35346792; PMCID: PMC9038709.
Part II. Will comprise a manuscript to be submitted with anticipated and authorship to be: Michelle. C. Rosenthal and John P. McGann.
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.