Staff View
Perceptions of beginning readers:

Descriptive

TypeOfResource
Text
TitleInfo (ID = T-1)
Title
Perceptions of beginning readers:
SubTitle
those who struggle and those who succeed
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.2/rucore10001600001.ETD.17442
Identifier
ETD_1154
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007)
English
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
Subject (ID = SBJ-1); (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Education
Subject (ID = SBJ-2); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Reading (Elementary)
Abstract
Statement of the problem. Viewing beginning readers through the lens of Vygotsky's (1978) notion of semiotic mediation, learning to read is a complex process in which meanings are not only encoded in print but shaped by the social and cultural experiences of the reader, the text, and the context in which the reading takes place. The purpose of this case study was to gain a holistic picture of four beginning readers of varying ability levels as they engage in literacy-learning activities in a first grade classroom and to answer the following questions, giving voice to each child as a beginning reader:
1. How do beginning readers perceive the nature of reading?
How do these perceptions differ according to reading ability?
2. What meanings do beginning readers construct from their literacy-learning experiences?
How do these perceptions differ according to reading ability?
Sample. Two successful beginning readers and two struggling beginning readers in a first grade classroom were selected based on fall benchmark assessments and in-class performance as observed by the teacher. Efforts were made to balance the sample according to gender, SES, and ethnicity.
Methods. Students were observed one day per week for twelve weeks. One semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant during the study to gain a sense of the child's understandings about the nature of reading and to see what meanings s/he constructs from literacy-related activities. Participants were also interviewed informally throughout the study as they engaged in various literacy learning activities. Documents and artifacts were collected as an additional way to give voice to the beginning reader (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). Discourse analysis (Gee, 2005) was used as a frame for developing individual case studies and cross-case analysis (Creswell, 1998; Merriam, 1998) to better understand the meanings children constructed about the nature of reading and the literacy-related instruction they experience.
Results and conclusions. The findings of this study suggest that succeeders and strugglers perceive the nature of reading differently, with succeeders viewing reading as a process of decoding text for meaning and strugglers viewing reading as a process of remembering. In addition, the findings suggest that succeeders and strugglers have different views of their instruction; print mediates the meanings constructed by succeeders in ways it does not for strugglers.
PhysicalDescription
Extent
vii, 276 pages
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references (p. 259-274).
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Halterman Brown
NamePart (type = given)
Tammy B.
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RUETD)
author
DisplayForm
Tammy B. Halterman Brown
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Morrow
NamePart (type = given)
Lesley M.
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Lesley M. Morrow
Name (ID = NAME-3); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Sharon
NamePart (type = given)
Ryan
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Ryan Sharon
Name (ID = NAME-4); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Jennifer
NamePart (type = given)
Rowsell
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Rowsell Jennifer
Name (ID = NAME-5); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
James
NamePart (type = given)
Christie
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Christie James
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2008
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2008-10
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg)
NjNbRU
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T33J3D9P
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (AUTHORITY = GS); (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
AssociatedEntity (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = 1)
Name
Tammy Brown
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
RightsEvent (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = 1)
Type
Permission or license
Detail
Non-exclusive ETD license
AssociatedObject (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = 1)
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Back to the top

Technical

Format (TYPE = mime); (VERSION = )
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
669696
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
f87b367351ab2e748fe36a8e69fdf050e36e8299
ContentModel
ETD
CompressionScheme
other
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
Format (TYPE = mime); (VERSION = NULL)
application/x-tar
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024