Home
Resource
Internal differences: secularism, religion, and poetic form in nineteenth-century American poetry
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(772.76 kb)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Dow, Donald W.. Internal differences: secularism, religion, and poetic form in nineteenth-century American poetry. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3T72HS7

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

Uniform TitleInternal differences: secularism, religion, and poetic form in nineteenth-century American poetry
NameDow, Donald W. (author); Warner, Michael (chair); McGill, Meredith (internal member); Evans, Brad (internal member); Jackson, Virginia (outside member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - New Brunswick
Date Created2008
Other Date2008-10 (degree)
SubjectLiteratures in English, American poetry--19th century--History and criticism, Secularism in literature, Religion in literature
Extentv, 295 pages
DescriptionAccounts of the origins of literary modernism typically point back to Walt Whitman's and Emily Dickinson's break with the received conventions of meter and rhyme. These accounts present the perceived break with tradition as authorizing a variety of practices, notably the privileging of innovation in poetic form as indicative of a work's sincerity and authenticity. The dissertation seeks to revisit the break from conventional form, not in terms of modernism, but in terms of the cultural significance of poetic form in the mid-nineteenth century, particularly given the impact of secularism on the preconceptions and critical conventions governing the role of the poet and the formation of the lyrical subject. An important vein of scholarship connecting literature with modern secularism -- going back to M. H. Abrams';s Natural Supernaturalism and beyond -- posits post-Enlightenment literary works as emerging out of the secularization of previously religious tropes and themes. Recent studies of secularism as a historical movement, however, present a more complicated account than the oft-told tale of the inevitable triumph of humanism over religion. In reading the formal choices that Dickinson's and Whitman's works display, I reveal the authors' complex engagement with vital changes not only within contemporary accounts of inspiration, identity, and publication, but also with the modes of spirituality that secularism paradoxically made available as part of its reconfiguration of religiosity on a personal, intimate scale.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references (p. 283-294).
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3T72HS7
LanguageEnglish
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024