Staff View
Preparation and evaluation of amphiphilic macromolecules-based conjugates and micelles for anticancer drug delivery

Descriptive

TypeOfResource
Text
TitleInfo (ID = T-1)
Title
Preparation and evaluation of amphiphilic macromolecules-based conjugates and micelles for anticancer drug delivery
SubTitle
PartName
PartNumber
NonSort
Identifier
ETD_1625
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.2/rucore10001600001.ETD.000051195
Language (objectPart = )
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2); (type = code)
eng
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
Subject (ID = SBJ-1); (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Biology
Subject (ID = SBJ-2); (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Drug delivery systems
Abstract
Micelles assembled from amphiphilic macromolecules (AM) or drug-conjugated AMs were evaluated as anticancer drug carriers in terms of drug content,
sustained/controlled drug release and cytotoxicity of encapsulated/bound drug. Physical drug encapsulation was compared with chemical drug conjugation. The AM micelles were compared with known polymeric delivery systems, Pluronic P85 and Cremophor EL. Generally, AM micelles encapsulated drugs as efficiently (or better) than the established polymeric carriers.
Encapsulated hydrophobic drugs in AM micelles showed non-aggregation of drug and sustained drug release after lyophilization and resolubilization in aqueous solutions; indicating good solution and storage stability of drug-loaded AM micelles. Compared to the polymeric controls, the AM micelles showed faster resolubilization times and better pH/temperature micellar stability.
Cellular entry of AM micelles in human umbilical vein endothelial cells was observed to be endocytotic, observed from the colocalization of fluorescein-labeled AMs and fluorescent dye-stained endosomes or lysosomes that were detected by confocal scanning
microscopy.
Doxorubicin (DOX) was conjugated to AMs via acidic pH-sensitive hydrazone linkers and the DOX-AM micelles had ~ 30 nm sizes. DOX-AMs showed higher drug release at lysosomal pH 5.0 as compared to physiological pH 7.4. Cell proliferation assays of DOX-AM micelles showed better cytotoxicity compared to DOX-loaded AM micelles and free DOX against human hepatocellular carcinoma cells.
As another example of drug conjugation, camptothecin (CPT) was conjugated to AMs via glycine linkers. CPT-AM micelles showed CPT lactone stabilization, higher CPT solubilization, and increased stability against human serum albumin (HSA) on CPT release in vitro. However, cell proliferation assays on the CPT-AM micelles showed comparable cytotoxicity to CPT-loaded AM micelles against human colorectal carcinoma cells.
The placement of CPT conjugation was evaluated by CPT conjugation via mucic acid and functionalized alkyl chains. Carbodiimides were used to conjugate CPT to AM mucic acid, whereas click chemistry conjugated alkyne-terminated CPT to azideterminated AM chains. Higher CPT conjugation was achieved via the functionalized chain ends (i.e. click chemistry) compared to the mucic acid (carbodiimide coupling).
However, lesser HSA impact on CPT in vitro release was observed in CPT attached to the mucic acid.
Overall, the AM-based micelles showed good characteristics as anticancer drug carriers.
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
Extent
xvii, 147 p. : ill.
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Leilani Singson del Rosario
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
del Rosario
NamePart (type = given)
Leilani Singson
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
author
DisplayForm
Leilani Singson del Rosario
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Uhrich
NamePart (type = given)
Kathryn
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
chair
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Kathryn E Uhrich
Name (ID = NAME-3); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Taylor
NamePart (type = given)
John
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
John Taylor
Name (ID = NAME-4); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Warmuth
NamePart (type = given)
Ralf
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
internal member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Ralf Warmuth
Name (ID = NAME-5); (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Grant
NamePart (type = given)
Barth
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
outside member
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
DisplayForm
Barth Grant
Name (ID = NAME-1); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
degree grantor
Name (ID = NAME-2); (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = )
school
OriginInfo
DateCreated (point = ); (qualifier = exact)
2009
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2009-05
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg)
NjNbRU
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3ZK5GW0
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (AUTHORITY = GS); (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
RightsEvent (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = 1)
Type
Permission or license
Detail
Non-exclusive ETD license
AssociatedObject (AUTHORITY = rulib); (ID = 1)
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Back to the top

Technical

ContentModel
ETD
MimeType (TYPE = file)
application/pdf
MimeType (TYPE = container)
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
28702720
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
50e2c62d480f1b7c1657e7722123265fbc1bb136
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024