Staff View
Pushing the limits of democracy

Descriptive

Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Andersen
NamePart (type = given)
David J.
DisplayForm
David Andersen
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Lau
NamePart (type = given)
Richard R.
DisplayForm
Richard R. Lau
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Leech
NamePart (type = given)
Beth
DisplayForm
Beth Leech
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Miller
NamePart (type = given)
Lisa
DisplayForm
Lisa Miller
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Lodge
NamePart (type = given)
Milton
DisplayForm
Milton Lodge
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2011
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2011-05
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Representative democracy proposes to give “power to the people” by allowing the electorate to choose its own leadership. However, previous research in Political Science has demonstrated that the American electorate is woefully uninformed, lacking even the most basic political knowledge. Further complicating the problems facing the American electorate is the fact that they are not able to focus upon each vote choice individually, but are asked to learn about various campaigns concurrently and cast their votes all at once on Election Day. This does not rule out the possibility of a successful system of elections, as Political Psychology has also demonstrated that voters are able to make high-quality decisions even with minimal knowledge by relying upon political cues and heuristics, reducing the level of knowledge necessary to make a vote choice. Unfortunately, the vast bulk of this literature focuses upon the electorate’s ability to select a presidential candidate using cues particularly effective for that office, ignoring lower offices and leaving a level of uncertainty about how voters respond to an election environment featuring concurrent campaigns. Using American National Election Study (ANES) survey data over a 20 year period, as well as an original experiment featuring dynamic information boards, this dissertation examines whether the number of elections on the ballot affects how voters search for information about all of the candidates seeking elective office, what voters are able to remember about them, and how they react to the presence of concurrent campaigns. The findings demonstrate that voters are less able to recall candidates for lower offices when higher offices are contested. Additionally, as more offices compete against each other, voters seek out less information about each individual set of candidates, but prioritize learning about higher office candidates over lower office candidates. Finally, this analysis shows that the amount of information a voter views about a candidate directly affects how accurate the perceptions of that candidate are. In sum, this dissertation identifies structural weaknesses present in the American system of elections that limit the ability of voters to focus upon each office equally.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Political Science
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Democracy--United States
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Political psychology--United States
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Political candidates--Research--United States
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Political science--Decision making
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_3332
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
xiii, 253 p. : ill.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by David J. Andersen
TitleInfo
Title
Pushing the limits of democracy
SubTitle
concurrent elections and cognitive limitations of voters
Identifier (type = hdl)
http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore10001600001.ETD.000060959
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3PK0FJQ
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

An error occurred while attempting to load this metadata section
Back to the top

Technical

FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
6366208
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
ContentModel
ETD
MimeType (TYPE = file)
application/pdf
MimeType (TYPE = container)
application/x-tar
FileSize (UNIT = bytes)
6369280
Checksum (METHOD = SHA1)
a107481553b540389519370315456209a34e81fa
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024