Cooperative organizations have the potential to issue a profound challenge to the status quo of the neoliberal political economy and dominant organizational paradigms. They go beyond the for-profit/not for-profit binary and open up spaces for socially grounded enterprise that help to complicate the dominant understanding of the economy. The dissertation explores two consumer food cooperatives in Philadelphia, PA. Both organizations were founded in the early 1970s to provide healthy, inexpensive food—and an alternative to market capitalism. Over the last 40 years, the organizations have taken different paths to achieve their aims: one has expanded to two stores with a subsidiary non-profit education and outreach arm, and a hierarchical management structure; the other has expanded too, but is operated by a staff collective and encourages a strong culture of member participation. Both have responded to an increase in popularity by abolishing mandatory member labor and redefining the terms of membership. Through semi-structured interviews, document analysis and participant observation, this study examines the ways these organizations adapt to change and narrate their organizational lives. It asks why and how each organization comes to embrace its particular logics and practices. By attending closely to the voices of the research participants, the dissertation sketches out three main themes with which consumer cooperatives struggle. The first is a “paradox of exclusivity,” whereby they seek maximal inclusion of the public in the cooperative experiment but must draw cultural and organizational boundaries to maintain coherence. The second is the struggle to maintain standing as community based organizations devoted to civic purposes while balancing the books as a thriving business. The third is cooperatives’ commitment to participatory democratic practice, an ideal that they strive to attain through their adherence to and interpretation of the international cooperative principles. This dissertation contributes an understanding of consumer cooperatives to the planner and community developer. It advances the literature on organizational theory as regards institutional logics and organizational narratives. Finally, it employs critical event narratives and a storytelling approach to advance the use of narrative methods in qualitative research.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Planning and Public Policy
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_4555
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
ix, 319 p. : ill.
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Andrew William Zitcer
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Food cooperatives--Pennsylvania--Philadelphia--History--20th century
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Food cooperatives--Pennsylvania--Philadelphia--History--21st century
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.