This dissertation proposes Splitting theory of consonant epenthesis incorporating two key ideas: (1) there is a phonological operation ‘splitting’ where an input segment corresponds to multiple output segments, and (2) there is no insertion operation involving consonants. Within the Splitting theory epenthetic consonants always correspond to an input segment, and therefore the mapping is always regulated by constraints requiring input- output identity. From this perspective, homorganic glide epenthesis next to high vowels is the most faithful epenthesis possible. For example, in the mapping /i/→[ji], input /i/ corresponds to both [j] and [i] in the output, and both output segments preserve all input features. Splitting theory predicts that the epenthetic consonants may be unfaithful to their input vowel correspondent if the given vowel cannot faithfully appear in syllable margins. For example, there is no featurally identical glide counterpart of non-high vowels. Therefore next to non-high vowels there are several options for epenthetic consonants, all of which change some of the input’s features. While epenthetic consonants are generally as faithful as possible to the input segments from which they split, the most faithful consonant might be banned from a surface inventory. In these cases, the inserted consonant will be the one which preserves the input features protected by faithfulness constraints which are ranked the highest in a given language. An extreme case is found in Mongolian, where a dorsal/uvular stop is epenthesized in vowel hiatus because there is no other consonant that would preserve the place, voicing, and non-nasality of underlying vowels. Splitting theory’s emphasis on faithfulness disagrees with theories where the epenthetic segment does not correspond to any input segment. For example, Insertion theories predict that epenthetic [t] is possible, while Splitting theory imposes very restrictive (and practically insurmountable) conditions on any system having epenthetic [t]. Putative cases of epenthetic [t] are shown to admit alternative analyses (e.g. Ajyíninka Apurucayali). Splitting Theory is supported in an in-depth survey of the inventory of epenthetic consonants. The theory is illustrated by analyses of consonant epenthesis in Dutch, English, Faroese, Madurese, Mongolian, and Washo.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Linguistics
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_5801
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xv, 440 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Consonants
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Phonology
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Petr Staroverov
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.