Home
Resource
Co-producing soft law and uncertain knowledge
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(2.88 MB)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Scott, Deborah Ann. Co-producing soft law and uncertain knowledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T36M38PK

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleCo-producing soft law and uncertain knowledge
NameScott, Deborah Ann (author); Schroeder, Richard A (chair); St. Martin, Kevin (internal member); Lake, Robert W. (internal member); Campbell, Lisa M. (outside member); Rutgers University; Graduate School - New Brunswick
Date Created2015
Other Date2015-05 (degree)
SubjectGeography, Environmental policy, Global environmental change, Biomass energy
Extent1 online resource (xiii, 301 p. : ill.)
DescriptionIn this dissertation, I examine processes of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) to develop international soft law on biofuels and synthetic biology. I ask how decision-making happens in the unique context of this treaty and on these issues, specifically looking to the role of knowledge politics. To do this, I first establish the cultures and legal structures that have developed within the CBD’s permanent bodies, identifying characteristics that have drawn criticism but that also have the potential to establish the CBD as a productive forum for examining emerging and uncertain technosciences. I then turn to the treaty’s engagement with biofuels and synthetic biology under its “New and Emerging Issues” mechanism. I identify three main ways knowledge politics have been expressed: setting the issue’s scope; establishing appropriate sources and types of knowledge for decision-making; and the meaning and implications of scientific uncertainties. I trace how the political, scientific, and administrative bodies of the treaty have grappled with each of these aspects, in the process providing a forum for consideration of the treaty’s scope, its legal epistemology, and its approach to decision-making in a post-predictive paradigm. Research methods include textual analysis, semi-structured interviews, participant observation of CBD negotiating events, and observant participation of treaty processes through an internship and consultancy with the CBD Secretariat on synthetic biology. This dissertation speaks to scholarship on global environmental governance and the governance of emerging technologies, expanding the concept of the co-production of law and science to include soft international law and a broad range of scientific uncertainties.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Noteby Deborah Ann Scott
Genretheses, ETD doctoral
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T36M38PK
Languageeng
CollectionGraduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024