The basal forebrain (BF) is a region of heterogeneous neurons, some of which send axon terminals to the cerebral cortex. The main source of acetylcholine in the cortex arises from the cholinergic basal forebrain (BFc). Historically the BFc has been alternately described as diffuse and discrete, which has contributed to incompatible views of the system across and within scientific disciplines. The known anatomical details of the BF are not sufficient to explain the variety of functions it achieves in the cortex. This thesis describes three experiments that further investigate the anatomical details of BF cell topography, outputs, and inputs in the rat. The first utilizes retrograde tracing to show that cells projecting to visual and motor cortices are mostly found in the anterior diagonal bands and posterior basal forebrain, respectively. The BF topography of these two projection populations partially overlaps. There is also a segregation and overlap based on neurotransmitter content. The second experiment queries the BF topography of local afferents to BFc cells via monosynaptic viral tracing in ChAT-cre transgenic rats. BFc cells do not receive afferents from fellow BF cells spread across the entire BF volume. Instead, presynaptic cells coinhabit smaller pockets in which iii their postsynaptic cholinergic targets are found, suggesting the potential for modular control of portions of the BFc at the local level. The final study describes the inputs to BFc cells on the basis of their outputs to four different cortical targets utilizing the same viral tracer as above. It is possible to infect transgenic basalocortical cells via monosynaptic tracing vector injection in the cortex, at the site of axon terminals, thereby only labeling transynaptically those afferents contacting corticopetal BFc cells projecting to a particular cortical region. Subpopulations of basal forebrain cholinergic cells, that send their efferents to different cortical areas, did not receive homogeneous input, but rather received differing complements of synaptic inputs. These results reveal the network connectivity likely to be the precise architecture permissive of the differential control the BFc exerts over its various outputs. Along with this novel architecture comes a number of testable hypotheses put forth in the general discussion.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Neuroscience
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Basal ganglia
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - Newark Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10002600001
Identifier
ETD_6407
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3MC91WZ
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource xiii, 105 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Matthew Robert Gielow
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.