Staff View
Low-achieving students' perspectives regarding their experiences as recipients of instructional support delivered in a general education setting

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Low-achieving students' perspectives regarding their experiences as recipients of instructional support delivered in a general education setting
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Carman
NamePart (type = given)
Lynn Keller
NamePart (type = date)
1950-
DisplayForm
Lynn Keller Carman
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Lobman
NamePart (type = given)
Carrie
DisplayForm
Carrie Lobman
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School of Education
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2015
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2015-10
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2015
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Similar to administering support services for special education, basic skills instruction (BSI) for low achievers is increasingly being delivered in general education, or heterogeneous, classrooms. These practices have become more common as a result of research findings suggesting that an in-class setting is favored for struggling students. However, whereas some studies have shown heterogeneous compositions of students to be more beneficial than homogeneous settings, characteristic in pull-out instruction, conflicting evidence exists. While the intent of this study was not to confirm or deny whether the benefits of push-in settings outweigh those of pull-out settings, this phenomenology research examined this topic in a manner that has largely been ignored: examining students’ perspectives relating to their support experiences. Data collection methods consisted of interviews, observations, and students’ drawings. Participants were asked to draw pictures of classrooms they felt would be an ideal setting to receive their support instruction in. Data analysis of this qualitative study provides insight about why there are contrasting findings between existing studies. This research found that participants felt that in-class BSI support was a generally positive experience, and they credited much of the progress they have made during the school year to that program. According to these students, one of the most valuable aspects of receiving support in a heterogeneous setting was the fact that they receive help from the higher-performing students. By contrast, their drawings demonstrated that they favored being in a homogeneous setting for their support instruction. The participants preferred being in smaller group settings and being among students who performed similarly to themselves. Findings in this study also demonstrate that, when teachers provide a supportive classroom environment that includes differentiated instruction and mastery experiences, the support program works well. Results of this study suggest that policy makers and administrators should consider revisiting how their support programs are delivered. The results of this study provide them with a resource of valuable real-life information that other research has largely omitted. The participants’ perspectives of how they experience this phenomenon can help towards the construction of more effective support instruction for the low-achieving student population.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Early Childhood/Elementary Education
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Academic achievement
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Self-perception in adolescence
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_6703
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (viii, 169 p.)
Note (type = degree)
Ed.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Lynn Keller Carman
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Education Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001500001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3XK8HH9
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Carman
GivenName
Lynn
MiddleName
Keller
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2015-09-04 09:07:38
AssociatedEntity
Name
Lynn Carman
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School of Education
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024