The study explores meta-evaluation as an approach that corporate learning functions can employ to assess the efficacy of a given evaluation method. To that end, an internal meta-evaluation was conducted to determine the utility, feasibility, propriety and accuracy of an already completed Success Case evaluation of a leadership development program within a global bank. Twenty-one subjects from the company’s Human Resources department, including the researcher, participated in the meta-evaluation. The researcher personally recruited the subjects based on their involvement with the leadership development program’s design and deployment. Data were collected via online questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and a review of archival data. The meta-evaluation findings suggest that the Success Case evaluation met the overall standard of propriety to a “very great extent,” and the standards of accuracy, feasibility and utility to a “great extent.” Specifically, while the participants in the study agreed with the Success Case evaluation’s primary conclusion that there were opportunities for the program to have greater business impact, they also identified limitations in the evaluation’s recommendations to improve the program and increase manager engagement. In addition to the efficacy of the Success Case Method using meta-evaluation criteria, the study discusses the opportunities and limitations of meta-evaluation as a potential approach to enable organizations to develop more robust, effective and comprehensive evaluation strategies.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Organizational Psychology
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Case method
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Organizational effectiveness
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7400
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (ix, 131 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Psy.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Kevin Robert Engholm
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001800001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Rutgers University. Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.