Fueled in part by fiscal challenges and structural shifts at the state and federal level, nonprofit organizations are increasingly relying on cross sector community partnerships to address wicked policy problems in areas such as community development, neighborhood revitalization, and health and human services. Cross sector community partnerships (CSCPs) blur sectoral boundaries by integrating the activities and modus operandi of organizations from the public, private, and civil society sectors. The literature on cross sector community partnerships has analyzed factors contributing to partnership success or failure, partnership growth, and more normatively, how crossing sectoral boundaries are an effective tool in addressing wicked community problems. Notwithstanding increased practical and empirical attention, cross sector community partnerships remain poorly understood and under-theorized (Googins & Rochloin, 2000; Selsky & Parker, 2005), particularly at the local level. Through a comparative case study of two New Jersey cities, this dissertation explores how local social, economic, and political institutional arrangements influence the formation and structure of cross sector community partnerships. Interviews, content analysis of media reports and partnership agreements, urban histories, and organizational documents are the primary data collection methods. Neighborhood and redevelopment plans provide additional data to develop the partnership narrative. I argue that variation in local institutional arrangements create community specific cross sector community partnership structures in response to demands from government and foundation funders. Several findings emerged from the study. First, the role of business remains muted and transactional. Second, nonprofits generally have an ad hoc internal vetting process to determine the viability of a partnership strategy. Third, although local government actors are present in cross sector community partnerships, their participation is largely symbolic. Finally, the role of nonprofit intermediaries is particularly salient, as they dominate partnership formation processes and structure. Understanding the formation and structure of CSCPs at a more local level assists in identifying what structures need to be in place in order to implement more democratic forms of community partnerships.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Public Affairs
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Public-private sector cooperation--New Jersey
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Nonprofit organizations
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7545
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (vii, 231 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Kirk Leach
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Camden Graduate School Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10005600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.