Staff View
Studied enchantment

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Studied enchantment
SubTitle
scholarship and literature in Britain, 1862-1931
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Winick
NamePart (type = given)
Meryl
NamePart (type = date)
1984-
DisplayForm
Meryl Winick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Williams
NamePart (type = given)
Carolyn
DisplayForm
Carolyn Williams
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School - New Brunswick
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2016
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2016-10
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2016
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
How can we best understand the profusion of scholarly aesthetics in British literature in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, from the footnotes of Sir Walter Scott to the endnotes of The Waste Land? My dissertation argues that the scholarly aesthetics of both fiction and certain kinds of scholarship in this period appear as a means of managing enchantment— of deploying it, as well as containing it. Victorianists are accustomed to thinking of enchantment as that which the realist novel opposes; Modernists often think of it as the product of mass culture, ideology, and other sources of delusion. Both groups likely think of Max Weber’s idea of disenchantment as the defining condition of a secular modernity. In contrast, my dissertation considers a range of Victorian and modernist-era texts with reference to the flourishing critical conversation around “modern enchantments” that are knowing rather than naïve. Building on this work, I argue that a new kind of enchantment emerged in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Britain through scholarly practices that aimed at creating coherent accounts of nature, history, and society. Coherence appeared to offer satisfactions akin to those accompanying religious, especially mystical, experience— but to do so while also satisfying the demands of reason. I call the mixed genre of scholarship and fiction that fostered this reading experience “studied enchantment” to reflect its combination of sophistication and credulity. Across six chapters, my dissertation traces the emergence of studied enchantment, showing how scholarly practices informed novelistic writing while techniques of novel writing came to shape scholarly practices— and how negotiations over the best way to write about enchantment itself affected both novels and scholarship. I pay particular attention to writing by authors who themselves have been largely excluded from triumphal accounts of the history of scholarship: those often deemed to be particularly susceptible to being enchanted in a dangerous way because of their effeminacy, whether this referred to their gender, their imperfect educations, or a sense that their theories were biased rather than disinterested. Thus, the dissertation foregrounds not Walter Scott and T.S. Eliot, but George Eliot, Walter Pater, the medievalist Jessie L. Weston and her contemporary, the classicist Jane Ellen Harrison, and the aesthetic writer Vernon Lee (born Violet Paget). I treat the adventure writer H. Rider Haggard and the anthropologist J.G. Frazer as hyper-masculine counterpoints to the feminine or feminized authors considered in the other chapters. Through a literary-historical analysis of these author’s novels, essays, short stories, and monographs, I illuminate an overlooked history of humanistic endeavor centered on legitimizing religion for modernity. More specifically, this dissertation posits two linked historical and literary arguments: first, that studied enchantment emerged at a crucial point in literary and disciplinary history in Britain when professional scholarship appeared as an especially accessible and aspirational practice for those trying to reshape their world through writing; and second, that studied enchantment functions by using scholarly aesthetics to manipulate the reader’s attention, shifting her between stances of critical distance and immersion, playing with both skepticism and credulity to construct a fulfilling experience of belief in the narrative at hand. Studied Enchantment moves the eminent Victorians of disenchantment and the Modernist aesthetic re-enchanters to the background in order to offer a new vantage on the intertwined history of British scholarly and literary practice. In a period when higher learning was increasingly accessible, the literary production of learnedness was, paradoxically, located in popular as well as high culture. While a historically specific practice, studied enchantment can help us understand the continued popular deployment of scholarship in fiction and nonfiction from George Eliot to Virginia Woolf to The DaVinci Code, and its power to create enchanting narratives of alternative histories.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Literatures in English
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_7737
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xv, 328 p. : ill.)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
British literature--19th century--History and criticism
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
British literature--20th century--History and criticism
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Meryl Winick
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School - New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore19991600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3VD71TT
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Winick
GivenName
Meryl
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2016-10-03 16:50:23
AssociatedEntity
Name
Meryl Winick
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School - New Brunswick
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2016-10-31
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = end)
2018-10-31
Type
Embargo
Detail
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after October 31st, 2018.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.4
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-02-13T16:19:10
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-02-13T12:39:19
ApplicationName
Mac OS X 10.9.5 Quartz PDFContext
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024