Staff View
A funny thing happened on the way to my dissertation

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
A funny thing happened on the way to my dissertation
SubTitle
a performance of third wave teacher leadership in a bureaucracy
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Vingelli
NamePart (type = given)
Daniele
NamePart (type = date)
1980-
DisplayForm
Daniele Vingelli
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Lobman
NamePart (type = given)
Carrie
DisplayForm
Carrie Lobman
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Belzer
NamePart (type = given)
Alisa
DisplayForm
Alisa Belzer
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Morrow
NamePart (type = given)
Lesley
DisplayForm
Lesley Morrow
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
internal member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School of Education
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (qualifier = exact)
2017
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2017-05
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Since the 1980s, there has been a growing body of literature in support of restructuring the nation’s top-down educational system. At the same time, providing teachers with quality professional development (PD) has become a critically important task in this current era of accountability. When I began my dissertation work, I intended to study the impact of iterative, research-based professional development on my colleagues’ practices and PD satisfaction. Upon investigation of my research questions, the constraints to professional development in a public school operating within the bureaucracy of the New York City Department of Education became apparent. It then seemed more pressing to explore the PD experiences of staff members, especially the challenges for the teacher leaders on our school’s PD team in providing professional development within a top-down education system. The research questions I then developed for this study are: (1) What challenges does the PD team at a large urban high school navigate in attempting to plan and implement professional development over the course of one school year? (2) How does the instructional staff and administration experience the professional development processes at a large urban high school over the course of one school year? However, when attempting to answer my questions using the data that I had outlined for my original study, I realized that the participants’ experiences were difficult to convey using traditional research methods. After studying the performative social sciences, I concluded that a performative piece would help give voice and life to the story, and hopefully reach more audiences and raise awareness regarding the need to restructure the current top-down system. Surveys, focus groups, a participant observation journal, and a binder of documentation comprised the data for the study. Data collection methods provided an ongoing set of responses to the professional development activities at the site from every group of stakeholders: myself as the team leader, PD team members, teachers, department level administrators, and the principal. The data collection procedures aided me in exploring my research questions, and provided me with enough varied information to deeply understand participants’ perspectives to create the performance, which is presented herein as a screenplay of monologues. A review of the performance indicates that regardless of the PD structure in place at the site, changes in bureaucratic mandates and expectations caused changes to the school’s PD model, and, subsequently, conflict and stress within the team and dissension among staff members. Relying upon the support system they developed was often one of the only things that helped the team counteract the bureaucratic structure and culture embedded in the site. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are included.  
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Teacher Leadership
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_8111
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (vii, 131 p.)
Note (type = degree)
Ed.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Career development
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Bureaucracy
Subject (authority = ETD-LCSH)
Topic
Social sciences
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Daniele Vingelli
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Education Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001500001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3V98BWS
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Vingelli
GivenName
Daniele
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2017-04-21 11:15:59
AssociatedEntity
Name
Daniele Vingelli
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School of Education
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.3
ApplicationName
Mac OS X 10.7.5 Quartz PDFContext
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-04-26T02:43:29
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2017-04-26T02:43:29
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024