Staff View
The development and characterization of a contractile, composite scaffold for skeletal muscle tissue engineering

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
The development and characterization of a contractile, composite scaffold for skeletal muscle tissue engineering
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Browe
NamePart (type = given)
Daniel Patrick
NamePart (type = date)
1990-
DisplayForm
Daniel Patrick Browe
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Freeman
NamePart (type = given)
Joseph W
DisplayForm
Joseph W Freeman
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateOther (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2018-10
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes)
2018
Place
PlaceTerm (type = code)
xx
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf)
2018
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO639-2b); (type = code)
eng
Abstract (type = abstract)
Current treatments for large volume deficiencies in skeletal muscle tissue have significant drawbacks, and patients suffering from these defects would greatly benefit from a superior solution. Tissue engineers seek to develop a three-dimensional matrix that can serve as a scaffold for muscle cells to regenerate lost tissue. Although substantial progress has been made in growing myoblasts on various scaffolds and promoting fusion into myotubes, plenty of hurdles remain before these scaffolds can be considered the new gold standard treatment. Principally, current scaffolds fail to produce myotubes that are optimally organized and fully differentiated, leading to limited force production. Despite the fusion of myoblasts into myotubes, the tissue lacks some form of stimulation which occurs in the native in vivo environment. This stimulation may be provided by supplementing muscle force with artificial muscles, which are capable of actuation and force production with similar contractile stress to native muscle tissue.
The goal of this project is to utilize a specific type of artificial muscle, called ionic electroactive polymers, to provide electrical and mechanical stimulation to developing myoblasts on a fibrous, conductive scaffold that can provide topographical guidance cues. Thus, this contractile, composite scaffold would seek to closely mimic the in vivo environment of developing skeletal muscle, producing highly organized and differentiated muscle tissue. This project has the following aims: 1) Develop and characterize a biocompatible, ionic electroactive polymer which actuates in an electric field; 2) Develop, characterize, and evaluate the ability of a conductive, fibrous scaffold to promote the organization and differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes; 3) Characterize the in vitro response and evaluate the effect on myoblast differentiation of combined electrical and mechanical stimulation provided by the contractile, composite scaffold resulting from the first two aims.
The movement speed and contractile force of hydrogels made from poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate and acrylic acid were optimized, but the maximum contractile stress produced fell short of the estimated contractile stress of native muscle fibers. The biocompatibility of the hydrogels was boosted through the addition of a fibrous scaffold synthesized from a copolymer of polycaprolactone (PCL) and polypyrrole (PPy). Cell studies indicated that myoblasts have a clear preference for scaffolds with PPy-PCL compared with scaffolds made from only PCL. Myoblasts exhibited higher attachment, more proliferation, higher numbers of myotubes formed, and a higher fusion index on scaffolds made with PPy-PCL as compared with scaffolds made of PCL. The developed composite scaffold was seeded with myoblasts, and electrical stimulation was applied while the myoblasts were developing. The electrical stimulation patterns seemed to have a net negative effect on the survival of myoblasts, and there was no difference in the progress of differentiation between groups exposed to electrical stimulation and the control groups which received no stimulation. Further experiments are needed to fully control for the complexity of the stimulation patterns use, but this project provides a framework for evaluating the effects of combined stimulation on myoblast development.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Biomedical Engineering
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Tissue scaffolds
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Identifier
ETD_9077
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/T3028W5T
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
electronic resource
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xv, 134 pages : illustrations)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Note (type = statement of responsibility)
by Daniel Patrick Browe
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Browe
GivenName
Daniel Patrick
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2018-06-19 15:48:44
AssociatedEntity
Name
Daniel Patrick Browe
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.5
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018-06-19T15:14:12
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2018-06-19T15:14:12
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word 2010
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024