Staff View
The impact of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on obstetric outcomes and infection susceptibility among infants born to women with SLE

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
The impact of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on obstetric outcomes and infection susceptibility among infants born to women with SLE
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Dietz
NamePart (type = given)
Denise Elsasser
NamePart (type = date)
1979-
DisplayForm
Denise Elsasser Dietz
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
SCHWANDER
NamePart (type = given)
STEPHAN
DisplayForm
STEPHAN SCHWANDER
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
DEMISSIE
NamePart (type = given)
KITAW
DisplayForm
KITAW DEMISSIE
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
co-chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes); (qualifier = exact)
2019
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2019-10
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
Context: Understanding the obstetric outcomes in women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) continues to be an important area of research. Furthermore, understanding its impact on the fetal immune system is an emerging area of interest. Specific Aims: The specific aims of this dissertation were to 1) examine the obstetric outcomes of women with SLE in comparison to women without SLE in the United Kingdom (Study 1); and 2) to investigate whether infants born to women with SLE have a higher risk of infection, or of sepsis, when compared to infants born to women without SLE (study 2). Design, Setting and Subjects: The Clinical Research Practice Datalink (CPRD) – Gold, the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Mother-Baby linkage data were used to gather women with SLE enrolled in the database since inception (1987) for studies 1 and 2. The population for study 1 was women who became pregnant after diagnosis with SLE. Live born infants of women with SLE were ascertained as the exposed population in study 2. Women without SLE were utilized as a control group for the retrospective cohort study 1, and infants born to mothers without SLE were used as a control group in the retrospective cohort study 2. Results: Study 1 showed an increasing trend of frequency of outcomes among the SLE population. Specifically, the frequency of caesarian section (25.8% vs. 22.5%), preterm birth (9.2% vs. 6.2%), miscarriage (18.7% vs. 16.8%), and stillbirth (0.7% vs. 0.4%) was higher among women with SLE. While most outcomes showed an approximate 15% increase in frequency compared
to women without SLE, preterm birth and stillbirth was 45% increased. After adjustment for maternal age, parity and birthweight, caesarian section remained the only adverse event with an increased risk for women with SLE ([Adjusted Risk Ratio (aRR)] aRR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.97). When stratified by type, women with SLE were at a higher risk of elective caesarian section compared to women without SLE (aRR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.16, 3.11). Results from study 2 found that 15% of infants born to mothers with SLE had a general practitioner visit for infection in the first two years of life, compared to 12.3% of infants born to born to mothers without SLE (Risk Ratio (RR)= 1.11; 95%CI: 1.0, 1.4). Estimates adjusting for preterm birth and maternal age were similar (aRR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.62). The specific infection categories showing an increased risk in adjusted models were “other urinary tract infections” (aRR = 2.29; 95%CI: 1.00, 5.25) and “other bacterial infections” (aRR = 3.29; 95%CI: 1.00, 10.86). There was insufficient data to examine risk by time period. Infants of mothers with SLE were not at an increased risk for hospitalization due to infection or sepsis. Conclusion: Women with SLE are able to have successful pregnancy outcomes but are at higher risk for caesarian section (study 1). Infants to mothers with SLE do not appear to be at increased risk of infection overall but may be at a small increased risk of UTI and other bacterial infections (study 2). Further research is needed to clarify these associations.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Public Health
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Systemic lupus erythematosus -- Epidemiology
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Obstetrics -- Immunological aspects
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_10298
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (vi, 71 pages)
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-pnvy-xk11
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Dietz
GivenName
Denise
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2019-09-23 12:08:12
AssociatedEntity
Name
Denise Dietz
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.7
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word for Office 365
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-10-02T15:53:08
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-10-02T15:53:08
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024