Staff View
Post-operative outcomes associated with patients who receive the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block for pain management following major abdominal surgery: a systematic review

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Post-operative outcomes associated with patients who receive the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block for pain management following major abdominal surgery: a systematic review
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Brown
NamePart (type = given)
Rachel
NamePart (type = date)
1970-
DisplayForm
Rachel Brown
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Holly
NamePart (type = given)
Cheryl
DisplayForm
Cheryl Holly
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Jadotte
NamePart (type = given)
Yuri
DisplayForm
Yuri Jadotte
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
co-chair
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Nursing - RBHS
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes); (qualifier = exact)
2019
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2019-10
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
Purpose: The purpose of this review was to examine the evidence on post-operative outcomes associated with patients who receive the Transversus Abdominis Plan (TAP) block for pain management following major abdominal surgery.
Methodology: Papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI). Any disagreements that arose between the reviewers were resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer. Papers must have met any 7 out of 10 criteria on the JBI-QARI instrument in order to be included in the review. Also, to be included, papers must have scored a YES answer regarding the reliability of measurement and appropriateness of statistical tests used for analysis.
A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. An initial limited search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and CINAHL using keywords of TAP Block; abdominal surgery; anesthesia; enhanced recovery after surgery; length of stay was followed by an analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe article. An expanded second search using all identified keywords and index terms was then undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies (footnote chasing). Studies published in English and full text were considered for inclusion in this review as well. A timeframe for studies was not included to increase the sensitivity of findings.
Results: A total of 17 articles of studies were used for this review. In total nine countries and 1,550 participants were represented in the final analysis of eight findings for this study. This Comprehensive Systematic Review examined numerous post-operative outcomes of patients who had major abdominal surgery with the TAP block compared to those who did not have the TAP block. Final synthesis determined that utilizing the TAP block is efficacious in decreasing the length of stay, earlier time to movement, reducing episodes of post-operative nausea and vomiting, earlier time to bowel movement, flatus and may decrease the time to the patient’s first requested dose of narcotics. There was not enough evidence found on time to urination in the literature search, therefore this outcome could not be analyzed.
Implications for Practice:
The results of this study support the use of TAP block in clinical practice, educational and economic implementation. Understanding the influences on opioid addiction along with the fact that the TAP block has only been in use for less than 20 years, allows the opportunity to provide evidence-based practice educational training to health care providers to enhance their knowledge of care for the patient receiving the TAP Block. Knowledge translation of the TAP Block should be provided to staff members caring for the patient who receives the TAP Block.
The development of a comprehensive education module for medical and nursing students/professionals about the assessments of patients receiving the TAP Block can be completed and implemented into the practice setting. It is anticipated that the after implementing use of the educational module, the knowledge of medical and nursing students will be enhanced on assessment of patients who receive the TAP Block.
The opioid epidemic has fiscal implications from legal involvement, healthcare intervention, loss of productivity and treatment for addictions. The medical community has an ethical responsibility to explore ways to prevent the misuse of opioids. With this study’s findings medical efficacy has been supported. The impact this has in terms of cost efficiency, quality and safety should further be explored.
.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Post-Master's DNP Practice
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
TAP block
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Abdomen -- Surgery
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Anesthesia
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Enhanced recovery after surgery
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Length of stay
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_10180
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (38 pages) : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
DNP
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Nursing (RBHS) DNP Projects
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10004500001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-gd5d-rr16
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Brown
GivenName
Rachel
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2019-08-23 10:33:13
AssociatedEntity
Name
Rachel Brown
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Nursing - RBHS
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
RightsEvent
Type
Embargo
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2019-10-31
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = end)
2021-10-30
Detail
Access to this PDF has been restricted at the author's request. It will be publicly available after October 30th, 2021.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.5
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-08-23T10:32:40
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2019-08-23T10:32:40
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word 2016
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024