Staff View
Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward polyamory and responses to polyamorous clients: an exploratory study

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward polyamory and responses to polyamorous clients: an exploratory study
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Herbert
NamePart (type = given)
Adam
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB); (type = text)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Riggs-Skean
NamePart (type = given)
Karen
DisplayForm
Karen Riggs-Skean
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Williams
NamePart (type = given)
Nina
DisplayForm
Nina Williams
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
outside member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (keyDate = yes); (qualifier = exact)
2020
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (type = degree)
2020-10
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract
Western culture has historically promoted monogamy as the most widely accepted and advocated ethical/moral relationship option available. Polyamory, in contrast to monogamy, is defined by the possibility of multiple sexual or romantic partners simultaneously and openly. Recent research indicates that polyamory is becoming more prevalent as a relationship style. However, as public interest in polyamory has grown, education about polyamory has not made it into standard mental health curricula. Historically, the mental health fields have tended to pathologize polyamory. There is a dearth of studies exploring clinicians’ attitudes towards polyamory and how those attitudes may be influencing their responses to polyamorous clients. To address this gap, this study investigated psychotherapists’ attitudes towards polyamory and determined whether relationships exists between such attitudes and responses to polyamorous clients. This study also sought to identify which psychotherapist characteristics may be associated with anti-polyamory attitudes and responses to polyamorous clients. The study was conducted through an anonymous online survey of practicing mental health practitioners, including professional clinicians and graduate trainees. Participants were asked to read a fictional intake summary of a polyamorous client and then complete two client response measures. Other instruments administered included a measure of attitudes toward polyamory, an assessment of multicultural competency, and a training and experience questionnaire. Quantitative methods consisted of descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. Results displayed a negative, statistically significant relationship (p < .001) between age and attitudes toward polyamory, and a positive, statistically significant relationship (p = .012) between multicultural competence and attitudes toward polyamory. Another hierarchical multiple regression showed that there was a negative, statistically significant relationship (p = .032) between attitudes towards polyamory and unfavorable perceptions of the polyamorous client. Results demonstrate the need for clinicians to be more aware of their own bias and the impact of stigma on the therapeutic relationship, to further their knowledge of nontraditional living patterns, and for training institutions to recognize this as a part of cultural competence and be more mindful of its inclusion in the curricula. Future directions include additional research on the respective impacts of psychotherapists’ political/social values and sexual orientation on attitudes towards polyamory.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Polyamory
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Clinical Psychology
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001800001
Identifier
ETD_11292
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-vgnv-z061
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (vi, 80 pages)
Note (type = degree)
Psy.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD doctoral
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Herbert
GivenName
Adam
Role
Copyright Holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2020-10-12 12:17:10
AssociatedEntity
Name
Adam Herbert
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.7
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word 2016
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-10-12T11:51:18
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2020-10-12T11:51:18
Back to the top
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024