LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract
Although exposure to conflicting health-related information has been described as a growing problem worldwide (Carpenter et al., 2016), limited research has been conducted investigating the cognitive impact of such information. In a review conducted by Fan (2014), it was suggested that individuals exert greater cognitive effort when attending to conflicting information compared to congruent information. Therefore, individuals may employ strategies that are less cognitively burdensome after encountering conflicting information as a result of the limited availability of cognitive resources (Carpenter et al., 2016; Metzger & Flanagin, 2013). Although these strategies assist in the management of resources, they can greatly narrow the scope and/or depth of information processing, which may result in a degradation of performance. This reduction in functioning may have important implications for the ways in which individuals are capable of attending to health-related information, attaining related knowledge, and making important health decisions (Carpenter et al., 2016). Therefore, the main purpose of the study presented in this thesis was to test the relationship between conflicting health-related information exposure and attentional mechanisms, indexed by the Attentional Network Test (ANT, Fan et al., 2002). We proposed three main hypotheses: 1) exposure to conflicting health-related information (CHRI) would increase response errors during the ANT compared to participants assigned to the no conflicting health-related information (N-CHRI) condition, 2) exposure to CHRI would decrease the efficiency of each of the ANT systems (i.e., alerting, orienting, and execute control) compared to the N-CHRI condition, and 3) exposure to CHRI would increase self-reported workload, indexed by the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX, Hart & Staveland, 1988), after completion of the ANT. Data from 184 online participants were analyzed to investigate these hypotheses. The participants were randomly assigned to read an article containing either congruent or conflicting health-related information. Subsequently, they completed the ANT and NASA-TLX. Participants in the CHRI condition produced more errors and slower reaction times on the ANT, and reported higher levels of workload. Consistent with prior research (Nagler et al. 2019; Nagler, 2014), CHRI participants also reported greater feelings of nutritional confusion and backlash directed at nutritional recommendations and research after being exposed to the conflicting information. The results from these analyses suggest that exposure to conflicted-health related information has the potential to impact attentional mechanisms responsible for accurate and prompt responding to incoming information. While further investigation is certainly needed to better understand this relationship and the potential associated consequences, the findings presented in this thesis can serve as a valuable starting point.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Psychology
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_11206
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (xi, 54 pages)
Note (type = degree)
M.S.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.