LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
The number of patient deaths due to medical errors has increased in the past decade due to either human errors or errors in computer-aided decision support systems. These systems are often modeled using an expert medical algorithm and the plans of action based on the experts' theoretical knowledge and medical experience. But these approaches are prone to errors as the algorithm and the plans might have errors of omission and commission. Hence, there is a need to validate the expert algorithm and determine the correct plans which motivated this study. I have developed the goal realization framework for a medical goal named Establish IV Access (IV Goal) that optimized the IV realization algorithm based on the ground truth, i.e., medical process logs. I have built another framework that could detect the ground truth from the dataset where the IV goal was truly met to determine the medical algorithm’s accuracy, i.e., realization framework's accuracy. After multiple experiments, analysis, conclusions, and revisions of the algorithm, the expert model (algorithm) was optimized, and thus the goal realization framework achieved an accuracy of 100%. Other statistical analyses like age distribution of patients getting single v/s multiple IV attempts and traces following different branches (paths of the workflow) helped experts understand the standard medical procedure followed in the real-world for performing the IV goal. Using the optimized algorithm, we had determined eight concise and granular plan libraries that could be sent out as part of recommendations in the trauma resuscitation process while performing the IV goal.
The optimized algorithm (expert workflow model) is often challenging to interpret. Hence, workflow discovery algorithms or process mining tools have been developed that generate interpretable workflows or process maps. The data used for workflows is often synthetic or formed manually by the experts and motivated to build a third framework that could generate the dataset for a medical goal using the ground truth, i.e., medical process logs. The workflow developed using ideas from previous work and workflow discovery algorithms like PIMA is compared with the optimized expert algorithm to determine its fitness based on paths followed by traces and the statistical results generated from the goal realization framework.
Subject (authority = local)
Topic
Process mining
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Electrical and Computer Engineering
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
ETD_11609
PhysicalDescription
Form (authority = gmd)
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
1 online resource (viii, 72 pages)
Note (type = degree)
M.S.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Genre (authority = ExL-Esploro)
ETD graduate
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.