Staff View
Mapping global gross primary productivity on the Google Earth Engine platform – developing and applying an improved process-based ecosystem model

Descriptive

TitleInfo
Title
Mapping global gross primary productivity on the Google Earth Engine platform – developing and applying an improved process-based ecosystem model
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Shang
NamePart (type = given)
Hua
DisplayForm
Hua Shang
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
author
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Xu
NamePart (type = given)
Ming
DisplayForm
Ming Xu
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
chair
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Morin
NamePart (type = given)
Peter
DisplayForm
Peter Morin
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = local)
member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Lathrop
NamePart (type = given)
Richard
DisplayForm
Richard Lathrop
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = local)
member
Name (type = personal)
NamePart (type = family)
Whelan
NamePart (type = given)
Mary
DisplayForm
Mary Whelan
Affiliation
Advisory Committee
Role
RoleTerm (authority = local)
member
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
Rutgers University
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
degree grantor
Name (type = corporate)
NamePart
School of Graduate Studies
Role
RoleTerm (authority = RULIB)
school
TypeOfResource
Text
Genre (authority = marcgt)
theses
OriginInfo
DateCreated (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (keyDate = yes)
2023
DateOther (encoding = w3cdtf); (type = degree); (qualifier = exact)
2023-01
CopyrightDate (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2023
Language
LanguageTerm (authority = ISO 639-3:2007); (type = text)
English
Abstract (type = abstract)
The global carbon cycle has changed in response to climate change, and the effects of these changes, caused by anthropogenic factors such as the burning of fossil fuels and landscape alterations, are expected to be widespread. Terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP), the largest component flux of the global carbon cycle, plays a significant role in connecting the global carbon and water cycles and the energy balance between the atmosphere, biosphere, hydrosphere and pedosphere. Despite the development of various approaches and models for estimating terrestrial GPP at different scales, large discrepancies and uncertainties remain in long-term global GPP simulations. Therefore, it is of great value and necessity to better understand and accurately estimate the spatial and temporal patterns of terrestrial GPP. In this dissertation, we improved the performance of global terrestrial GPP simulation by: 1) improving the solar radiation transfer model within a canopy by considering multiple scattering and radiation partitioning; 2) reconstructing satellite-based leaf area index (LAI) data to minimize biases and errors caused by cloud contaminations and composite technique; 3) using high performance computing of the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. We estimated global terrestrial GPP at 0.25° spatial resolution and 3-hour temporal intervals using our integrated process-based ecosystem model from 2001 to 2020. In Topic1, we evaluated the performance of five climate variables derived from a new reanalysis dataset - air temperature, precipitation, downward shortwave radiation, air pressure, and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) - against observations from 167 worldwide flux tower sites at both daily and annual scales. The results showed that all of the variables performed reliably, with the exception of precipitation, which had a tendency to be overestimated. In addition, we examined the temporal and spatial patterns of these variables from 2001 to2020. We found that global air temperature, solar radiation, VPD, and precipitation showed significantly increasing trends at rates of 0.7°C/decade, 3.1W/m2/decade, 0.15KPa/decade, and 49.6mm/decade, respectively, while air pressure did not show any significant changes over this time period. The climate variables also showed different spatial variations at the global scale and their changes over the past decades were not homogenous in space. In addition to evaluating the climate variables, we also assessed the performance of reconstructing MODIS LAI products in 24 typical regions, which covered a range of major climate and vegetation types. The MODIS LAI datasets were affected by cloud contamination and composite techniques and did not perform well in areas with long-term continuous cloud cover, where LAI values were severely underestimated. We developed a new clean-up algorithm to improve the LAI data by including spatiotemporal correlations of neighboring pixels and applied double logistic functions to achieve continuous LAI time series. The results showed that most of the outliers were detected and removed, and the fitted double logistic curves well characterized the variations and patterns of annual LAI, reasonably captured the timing of vegetation phenology between growing and non-growing seasons, and retained the duration of peak within the growing season for both single vegetation cycle and double vegetation cycles.
In Topic 2, we found that the good performance of the empirical radiation partitioning approach indicated that it could be used to derive the two radiation components - direct and diffuse - when only total solar radiation information was available. Additional, the absorption fraction simulated by the two stream approach, which considered multiple scattering, was lower than that estimated by Beer’s law regardless of the LAI and diffuse radiation fraction. The discrepancy in absorption fraction reached up to 73% in an overcast day. We further compared the performance of the Beer’s law (BL) model, the two-stream big-leaf (TS-BL) model, and our integrated radiative transfer (RTM) model – the two-stream two-leaf (TS-TL) model - in simulating GPP and found that our TS-TL model reduced the RMSE and bias by up to 72% and 81% based on the BL model, and up to 63% and 75% based on the TS-BL model, respectively. Overall, our integrated RTM (TS-TL model) exhibited large improvements and robust performance in estimating GPP, especially in areas with a dense vegetation cover.
In Topic 3, we developed a comprehensive process-based ecosystem model, driven by new reanalysis climate data and satellite-based LAI data, to estimate global GPP by using different biochemical photosynthesis models for C3 and C4 plants on the GEE platform. The results were evaluated by comparing the simulated GPP to observations from 167 flux tower sites, and the modeled GPP estimates were highly correlated to the flux tower observations for all vegetation types at both half-hour and annual scales. The annual global terrestrial GPP simulated by our integrated model ranged from 118 PgC to 134 PgC, with an average of 128 PgC, during 2001-2020, and showed a significantly increasing trend with an average rate of 0.71 PgC/yr globally. When compared to recent GPP estimates and products, our simulated results were within a reasonable range of global terrestrial GPP estimations but had some discrepancies due to the different models, parameters, and driving data used to simulate GPP. In addition, the sensitivity analysis exhibited that our simulated GPP was most sensitive to the biophysiological parameters V_cmax25 and LAI, highlighting the need for accurate biophysiological parameters at large scales.
Subject (authority = RUETD)
Topic
Ecology
Subject (authority = LCSH)
Topic
Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
Rutgers University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = RULIB)
ETD
Identifier
http://dissertations.umi.com/gsnb.rutgers:12343
PhysicalDescription
InternetMediaType
application/pdf
InternetMediaType
text/xml
Extent
121 pages : illustrations
Note (type = degree)
Ph.D.
Note (type = bibliography)
Includes bibliographical references
Subject
Name (authority = LCNAF)
NamePart (type = corporate)
Google Earth
RelatedItem (type = host)
TitleInfo
Title
School of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Identifier (type = local)
rucore10001600001
Location
PhysicalLocation (authority = marcorg); (displayLabel = Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
NjNbRU
Identifier (type = doi)
doi:10.7282/t3-a9c3-vh37
Back to the top

Rights

RightsDeclaration (ID = rulibRdec0006)
The author owns the copyright to this work.
RightsHolder (type = personal)
Name
FamilyName
Shang
GivenName
Hua
Role
Copyright holder
RightsEvent
Type
Permission or license
DateTime (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact); (point = start)
2023-02-23T13:52:37
AssociatedEntity
Name
Hua Shang
Role
Copyright holder
Affiliation
Rutgers University. School of Graduate Studies
AssociatedObject
Type
License
Name
Author Agreement License
Detail
I hereby grant to the Rutgers University Libraries and to my school the non-exclusive right to archive, reproduce and distribute my thesis or dissertation, in whole or in part, and/or my abstract, in whole or in part, in and from an electronic format, subject to the release date subsequently stipulated in this submittal form and approved by my school. I represent and stipulate that the thesis or dissertation and its abstract are my original work, that they do not infringe or violate any rights of others, and that I make these grants as the sole owner of the rights to my thesis or dissertation and its abstract. I represent that I have obtained written permissions, when necessary, from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation and will supply copies of such upon request by my school. I acknowledge that RU ETD and my school will not distribute my thesis or dissertation or its abstract if, in their reasonable judgment, they believe all such rights have not been secured. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use all or part of this thesis or dissertation in future works, such as articles or books.
Copyright
Status
Copyright protected
Availability
Status
Open
Reason
Permission or license
Back to the top

Technical

RULTechMD (ID = TECHNICAL1)
ContentModel
ETD
OperatingSystem (VERSION = 5.1)
windows xp
CreatingApplication
Version
1.5
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2023-01-06T15:15:34
DateCreated (point = end); (encoding = w3cdtf); (qualifier = exact)
2023-01-06T15:15:34
ApplicationName
Microsoft® Word 2013
Back to the top
Version 8.5.3
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2023