Home
Resource
Differentiating dominant and minority group responses to ingroup transgressions: a cross-status collective guilt model
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Plug-in required
PDF-1(653.96 kb)
Citation & Export
View Usage Statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Saud, Lina H.. Differentiating dominant and minority group responses to ingroup transgressions: a cross-status collective guilt model. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-dq90-q756

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

TitleDifferentiating dominant and minority group responses to ingroup transgressions: a cross-status collective guilt model
NameSaud, Lina H. (author); Rudman, Laurie (chair); Hoggard, Lori (member); Sanchez, Diana (member); Shelton, Nicole (member); Rutgers University; School of Graduate Studies
Date Created2022
Other Date2022-01 (degree)
SubjectSocial psychology, Political science, Collective guilt, Group processes
Extent94 pages : illustrations
DescriptionCollective guilt is an aversive emotional reaction to ingroup blame that motivates corrective action. Extensive research has examined collective guilt among dominant group members for historical atrocities such as slavery or colonialism. To date, minorities’ experiences of collective guilt have been largely ignored. This dissertation tests for the first time a Cross-Status Model of Collective Guilt. Yielding to group blame was expected to predict collective guilt and intentions to repair harm from ingroup transgressions regardless of group status. Unique moderators of acquiescing to group blame were expected: ingroup identification would moderate reactions to blame for dominants, while linked fate and awareness of disadvantage would moderate responses to blame for minorities. White (dominant; N = 913) and Muslim (minority; N = 1073) Americans were recruited to assess responses to ingroup blame for violent extremists from their respective groups. Collective guilt was pervasive among Muslims. Whites resembled Muslims in their yielding to group blame, where the three aforementioned moderators behaved similarly across status in three serial moderated mediation models. Data from a replication sample of Muslims (N = 536) reaffirmed the patterns found in the original sample. The implications of these findings are discussed.
NotePh.D.
NoteIncludes bibliographical references
Genretheses
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-dq90-q756
LanguageEnglish
CollectionSchool of Graduate Studies Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Organization NameRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
RightsThe author owns the copyright to this work.
Version 8.5.5
Rutgers University Libraries - Copyright ©2024